3 ms·
For what it's worth, there's Gemini. You can't really call it rich document though, as styling is left to the user consuming the content.
by jgilias 4y ago
For what it's worth, there's Gemini. You can't really call it rich document though, as styling is left to the user consuming the content.
- bobajeff 4y agoWell I don't want styling just document structure/description (eg. H1-8, Title, EM, P, IMG, Author, Article, Forum-Post, Search-Result) and yes I want images too so Gemini goes way too far my uses.
- postalrat 4y agoImages complicate the accessible requirement.
- bobajeff 4y agoTrue, it's still worth doing though. That's one of the reasons for alt, longdesc, and aria-describedby attributes.
- postalrat 4y agoWhat image formats will be support? Plain old 256 color uncompressed bitmaps? Why leave an existing protocol and easy accessibility just for a few images.
- bobajeff 4y agoI'm not sure I know how to explain it. Images just seem a basic part of content. I just don't think it's acceptable to have to open up an external application to view images in a document. Any way I'm not against image galleries and video sites either. I just want control over how I consume those. If I want the page read to me it should be possible. If I want to consume it on a tiny 2x2" e-ink display that should be doable.
- hiccuphippo 4y agoYes, I'd really like an HTML subset without CSS or Javascript.