Uhm, it's an example how we recognize more than just gender as biological predisposition in sports to allow "inferior" sportspeople to compete, so I don't see h

Uhm, it's an example how we recognize more than just gender as biological predisposition in sports to allow "inferior" sportspeople to compete, so I don't see how it doesn't. The fact that those are orthogonal today matters exactly how (when talking about introducing more granularity at the first, gender level)?