5 ms·
This is much more likely to be incompetence than malice. There's no compelling reason not to comply with the WARN Act.
by eitally 4y ago
This is much more likely to be incompetence than malice. There's no compelling reason not to comply with the WARN Act.
- yakak 4y agoI think most companies comply by still not giving notice but paying out the 60 days in the severence plan, what is not compelling about saving 30000 employee/days of salary?
- subtra3t 4y agoA good rule of thumb (even in the case of companies) is to assume incompetence rather than malice.
- Anunayj 4y agoFor those interested, this adage is known as Hanlon's razor[1] 1. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hanlon's_razor https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hanlon's_razor