3 ms·

caught acknowledging instant classic.

• rdtsc 15y ago
  > caught acknowledging instant classic. Those that can, comment, those that have nothing to say, make fun of those who speak English as a third language. http://blog.mongodb.org/post/381927266/what-about-durability http://blog.mongodb.org/post/381927266/what-about-durability Feb, 2010 "We get lots of questions about why MongoDB doesn’t have full single server durability, ...there are some very practical reasons why we think single server durability is overvalued" http://www.mongodb.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=2752708&navigatingVersions=true http://www.mongodb.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=2752708&... May, 2010 "MongoDB does not publish any official benchmarks...." EDIT: Added link to blogs, quoted parent, in case gets removed
  • pork 15y ago
    A moot point since single server durability is enabled by default in Mongo now, actually from the 1.8 stable (currently at 2.0 stable)
    • rdtsc 15y ago
      Not moot for someone who already chose a different product because of that. These decision are extrapolated and people infer the quality and seriousness of engineering from such decisions. Those, in my opinion, matter more than marketing or flashy websites.
      • pork 15y ago
        That's a fair point, but the product as it stands is very usable for me. Even if they never updated it, I would keep this build as something that is more than adequate for what it does.