3 ms·
I put apolitical in quotes there for a reason. Likely to be perceived as neutral, not politically active or making any particular statement. But that perception
by giraffe_lady 4y ago
I put apolitical in quotes there for a reason. Likely to be perceived as neutral, not politically active or making any particular statement. But that perception isn't from nowhere and doesn't mean it's not political.
You can refute any specific thing I say about a garden or whatever. But there will always be things. Everyone has recreational access, but does everyone have recreational time? Can everyone get the paints needed to recreate it? etc.
Something is apolitical from a person's perspective when it embeds their political assumptions, basically. It's not necessarily wrong to describe something that way, but that assertion needs to carry with it a context within which it is neutral. Whether a specific viewer will receive it as political is a fact about the observer, not the piece of art.
- TedDoesntTalk 4y ago> Whether a specific viewer will receive it as political is a fact about the observer, not the piece of art. That’s your key point. If someone wants to see politics in a work of art for which the artist imbued no politics of his own, they will find it. If someone wants to take offense to a statement, they will, regardless of speakers intent. And so this really is a pointless discussion when you are saying that an elephant can be interpreted as a mouse, if the observer perceives it as such.
- jjulius 4y agoThanks! This puts it a lot more succinctly/clearly than I could.
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]