4 ms·
I'm in that "0%", for what it's worth. I want the leisure time my kids and I spend on X-Plane to count towards my/their overall ability to fly a small plane so
by TimTheTinker 4y ago
I'm in that "0%", for what it's worth.
I want the leisure time my kids and I spend on X-Plane to count towards my/their overall ability to fly a small plane someday (a lifelong dream), but (a) I don't have room for flight gear -- there's barely space for my tiny home office desk, and (b) I can't even justify spending $100 right now for a flight yoke amid other financial obligations (it was a splurge to spend $60 for X-Plane 11).
Honestly, I probably would have bought Microsoft's 2020 FS instead if it ran on macOS.
- Alupis 4y agoYou don't need to invest in all that kit if you don't want too - I have most of the pretty typical "kit" for a flight simmer, yet I'm often too lazy to haul it all out and set it up (I don't leave it out in between "sessions" since I work from that computer too). So, very often I wind up flying with just my cheap Logitech joystick, but even an XBox controller would be a huge step up from mouse/keyboard only. Having programmable buttons available at your fingertips without having to take your eyes off screen and look for a button really adds to the immersion in my opinion.
- quest88 4y agoMy opinion is that people who start in simulator have a hard time adjusting to flying visually (the fundamentals). The sim forces you to look at your instruments which is a bad habit to break. But something constructive: Consider enrolling them in the Young Eagles (https://www.eaa.org/eaa/youth/free-ye-flights https://www.eaa.org/eaa/youth/free-ye-flights) if you haven't already.
- TimTheTinker 4y agoInteresting, I'm not sure I agree. I can take off and land a small plane in a simulator without looking at the instruments at all (except maybe a couple glances at the air speed indicator as I set up for landing), and I've never flown in a real small plane. I always thought visual flying was a crutch and instrument flying is the "real thing" that I know I can't do.
- bityard 4y agoNo, both types of flying are very important to "real" pilots. The kind of flying you're doing (basically) is called VFR, for visual flight rules. You keep an eye on your instruments of course but a lot of the flying is getting done just by looking out the window. While a trained pilot certainty CAN fly on instruments alone (which is a separate certification on top of your regular license), no sane pilot would choose to ignore what is happening outside if visibility is decent. GOOD pilots like to have all the information they can, at all times.
- nightski 4y agoI solo'd an aircraft on my 16th birthday and learned everything I knew up to that point in Falcon 4.0, Flight Unlimited, Fly!, MSFS, and more sims from that day. Of course we went over it in training, but the sim work that preceded it was extremely helpful and I breezed through the instruction.
- yellowapple 4y agoAin't that kind of the point: to be forced to actually look at your instruments? From what little I know about flying, that's kind of a critical skill unless you expect to only fly in VFR conditions and never IFR.
- FartyMcFarter 4y agoThe first pilot license most people get involves flying VFR almost exclusively.
- MaxBarraclough 4y agoWe can drop the 'almost'. If a pilot holds only a basic PPL, that means they aren't qualified for any flight in IMC. These days it's common for PPL student pilots to undergo a little training under simulated IMC, but inadvertent VFR flight into IMC is an emergency condition and, if I understand correctly, is the top cause of fatal VFR aviation accidents.
- gramie 4y agoYou might want to check into ultralight flight training. Much cheaper than a "real" private pilot's license (in Canada, a minimum 10 hours of flight time, including 2 solo, although it's sensible to budget for double that). At my local airport, ultralights can be rented for CAD $150/hour or so. There is also the classroom portion, which for an ultralight should be under CAD $1,000.