> However the R in RISC revers to the how many instruction you have to implement to get a job done. right, the way i always understood it was, in many situatio

> However the R in RISC revers to the how many instruction you have to implement to get a job done. right, the way i always understood it was, in many situations there are different riscs that are appropriate (e.g i only need 32-bit integer and atomic instructions for job x) so instead of accumulating larger and larger single spec, you can pick and choose whats needed: you can have still have your risc (fewer, simpler, efficient instruction) cake and eat it (deploy it in various divergent situations and still be standard) too