2 ms·
There is, as far as I know, no fundamental physical reason that prevents us from having high-efficiency electrolysis and high-efficiency fuel cells. As an exam
by choeger 4y ago
There is, as far as I know, no fundamental physical reason that prevents us from having high-efficiency electrolysis and high-efficiency fuel cells.
As an example (I did not try to corrobate the report) here is a company that claims 95% for the former:
https://newatlas.com/energy/hysata-efficient-hydrogen-electrolysis/ https://newatlas.com/energy/hysata-efficient-hydrogen-electr...
So while it is true that current technology doesn't make hydrogen look like a viable option, improvements like we have seen in the field of lithium ans other batteries are probably possible and could change that outlook massively.
If someone manages to produce 1kg of hydrogen for $1, that would, more or less, equal the current high spot price of natural gas ($9 for 1 million BTU, according to Wolfram alpha that's 293kwh).
- ncmncm 4y agoHydrogen is certainly viable, but it will take a long time to build out the equipment to produce enough of it. Every last kg produced will be spoken for. Once LH2 aircraft enter any route, kerosene craft will suddenly be wholly unable to compete. But it needs abundant renewables, and synthesis equipment and underground tankage at airports.