>But going onsite or remote interviewing for 4 hours is more reasonable? I would never subject myself to a 4 hour interview either. What information can a comp

>But going onsite or remote interviewing for 4 hours is more reasonable? I would never subject myself to a 4 hour interview either. What information can a company get in 4 hours they can't get in 1 hour? Seems like a massive waste of time done by a hiring process created by people that don't know any better. If you want seniors to even consider you, you need to ditch all that garbage and save it for people fresh in the field. Now if you are willing to pay double market rates you'll get more seniors willing to go through that, but if you are paying "market" rates and "good" benefits, you're not going to get the interest.