> I took the time to read the comments on the issue and I can't see anyone refusing to do this. Personally, I see a lack of interest and a lack of desire to ex

> I took the time to read the comments on the issue and I can't see anyone refusing to do this. Personally, I see a lack of interest and a lack of desire to expand the functionality > It seems like the person that suggested it can't compile ventoy as it requires a particular version of fedora. Yes, that was me. > This needs somebody to compile ventoy and make a PR. As you may guess by how I explained the problem and the solution (with code!), I would be happy to make a PR, but I don't want to waste more time by writing code that won't be merged. > solving the issue where it needs an old version of fedora would make it easier for others to participate Yes, that too But given the lack of interest by the maintainer of the low hanging fruit of making ventoy usable on partitions, even when it would bring the side benefit of respecting the block size of removable media (like thumbdrives, SD cards...) I think working on either would be a waste of time :( > The best way of moving this forward would be to free up a block of time and either work on a PR, or if not that a PR to make ventoy compilable on more distros. A week ago, someone started a fork for a better integration with other tools. If you want to join in to fix the compilation issues (so that it doesn't require a specific old Fedora for example) I'll be happy to fix the partition stuff. My email is my nickname at outlook dot com