4 ms·
Depending on your hardware, Desktop Linux may work much better in a VM on a Windows host than booting the machine directly to it. Far more stable, less screwing
by corrral 4y ago
Depending on your hardware, Desktop Linux may work much better in a VM on a Windows host than booting the machine directly to it. Far more stable, less screwing with configs to get everything working. You know suspend will work (in the form of saving the VM's state). You get snapshotting, and not just of the disk, which can be really handy. Easy to clone machines for complete isolation of e.g. work projects. Depending on your workflow this can be nicer than one machine with multiple accounts (see again: state-saving suspends, even across host reboots).
Even more true for the BSDs and other, even more obscure operating systems.
Not really viable on portable machines, though. Too much power use. Desktop, however, is great.
- wil421 4y agoI can echo your statements. My NAS runs FreeNAS and I also use Hyper-V to run a VM on my Windows desktop with lots of RAM. Jails on FreeBSD were easy enough to work with on FreeNAS but I prefer for the NAS to be a NAS. It runs on an i3 with ECC memory.