> [The “!” operator] is similar to Rust's `.unwrap()` but even more invisible. I had this thought too when reading Hare examples. When looking at a line like t

> [The “!” operator] is similar to Rust's `.unwrap()` but even more invisible. I had this thought too when reading Hare examples. When looking at a line like this: fmt::println("Hello World!")!; I notice that the punctuation at the end of the function call blends together, and the error assertion operator is easy to miss. I prefer Zig's convention of requiring the 'catch' keyword anytime a function call can raise an error. An example from Zig's documentation: const number = parseU64("1234", 10) catch unreachable; This error assertion stands out (especially with syntax highlighting).