5 ms·

Nice to see comparison done to the previous version of TimescaleDB rather than comparison to other vendors, which always tends to be questionable and biased

• Tostino 4y ago
  Right...benchmarking is hard, even for people who "know what their doing"
  • PeterZaitsev 4y ago
    Yes. And BenchMarketing is easy but does not serve your customers well
  • deepsun 4y ago
    Just discuss your results with developers of all the products you benchmark with, prior to publishing.
• avinassh 4y ago
  This comment instantly reminded me of recent QuestDB's benchmark and the rebuttal by Clickhouse. Both make a great read: 4Bn rows/sec query benchmark: ClickHouse vs. QuestDB vs. Timescale - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31585563 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31585563 No, QuestDB is not Faster than ClickHouse - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31767858 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31767858
  • qoega 4y ago
    Did you miss previous try of TimescaleDB to show that they are better than ClickHouse https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28945903 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28945903?
    • avinassh 4y ago
      Oh, I wasn’t implying Timescale is better than the other. That comment by GP reminded me of what happened last week
    • csdvrx 4y ago
      Looks like you are getting downvoted. I didn't miss this previous try. It's funny (and sad) it keeps going on.