Thanks for the mailing list link. Here is the status: "This one had to be paused for a bit to work out some issues around using a wider type to hold the epoch

Thanks for the mailing list link. Here is the status: "This one had to be paused for a bit to work out some issues around using a wider type to hold the epoch value, to accomodate some DTLS-SCTP use cases involving associations expected to remain up for years at a time. https://github.com/tlswg/dtls13-spec/issues/249 https://github.com/tlswg/dtls13-spec/issues/249 ends up covering most of the topics, though the discussion is a bit jumbled. We have a proposed solution with almost all the signoffs needed, and should be attempting to confirm this approach at the session at IETF 112 next week... "I'm sorry that these have been taking so long; these delays were unexpected."