> If you find the page "over the top", it is not because the page is over the top, but because you don't have anything to secure that is in the cost range of th

> If you find the page "over the top", it is not because the page is over the top, but because you don't have anything to secure that is in the cost range of the attacks being outlined. The page states that *all users* should disable all dynamic clock states and that all OS creators should do the same by default. That's very different than the very obvious info you just shared and in my opinion extremely over the top. What attack scenario do you think *users* would be targeted with? Edit: Just to be clear, if you store state secrets, are a cloud provider or otherwise hosts services that could be targeted by hertzbleed, by all means gimp your CPU if your research tells you that it is important. There's just no reason to do so for the normal user and I think if you are in the class of people that need to secure something like that, it's narcissistic to believe they need to read the rant-ish site the OP posted to realize it.