2 ms·
>The content producer is incentivized to make content as quickly as possible in as little effort as possible and cover it with as many ads as possible. It all
by psychoslave 4y ago
>The content producer is incentivized to make content as quickly as possible in as little effort as possible and cover it with as many ads as possible.
It all depends on the author/producer resources and goals. If resource acquisition doesn’t enter in the equation of a specific work, there is no reason to expect the advertisement industry to influence it directly in such a way, does it?
- kristopolous 4y agoI don't understand. Can you give some examples? Let me make the theoretical claim clear first: Regardless of the sentiments of a creator, so long as there's SEO pumpers creating similar content, the creator will be crowded out unless they also play that game. This theory explains why given say a new scientific finding, often a content factory's misreading of the results as opposed to the official statement from the research institute is what gets passed around. Essentially there's a requisite to engage with "the game" to capture exposure and connect with those who you wish to communicate with which is reliant on increasing metrics instead of merit. I've called it the "fast-fooding of content" in other writings on the topic. Please engage with me if you have counterexamples, I'm not married to any particular idea.