3 ms·
You raise some good points here. I think ultimately it's clear that as cool as the Courier may have been, a "real" Windows tablet like the Win 8 Metro that's be
by wanorris 15y ago
You raise some good points here. I think ultimately it's clear that as cool as the Courier may have been, a "real" Windows tablet like the Win 8 Metro that's been previewed is the product Microsoft can really build around.
In a perfect world, we'd have both devices, but there's an enormous danger in releasing an interim niche product before your real product arrived -- for example, the press surrounding the Kin phone was devastating, and almost certainly hurt the release of WinPhone 7. Even if the Courier turned out to be a success, it could have confused the marketplace.
It's often said that one of Steve Jobs' greatest strength was his willingness to kill products before the light of day unless they were the right products and they were good enough. It's interesting that Ballmer leaned on Gates to make this decision, but I think Gates's decision was the right one for Microsoft.
- brudgers 15y agoJobs could kill projects that way because Apple doesn't rely on partnerships in the way Microsoft does. In other words, in planning for the iPad launch Apple could call up Samsung and ask "Can you deliver 2m chips per month?" Conversely, Microsoft has to show Micheal Dell the Courier and ask, "Do you want to build these, and if so, when, and how many do you think it will take to be profitable, what sort of battery would you use, etc.?" Because of this, Microsoft has to be willing to fail somewhat publicly. Because of their size, Microsoft will have failures that sound big - but really, on a corporate scale, 130 people on a project that gets cancelled isn't very many.