"that would be resistant to seizures and censorship" - from a cursory look, blocking the protocol and/or identifying peer nodes for a participant is almost triv

"that would be resistant to seizures and censorship" - from a cursory look, blocking the protocol and/or identifying peer nodes for a participant is almost trivial, for a state-sponsored actor.I dind't see anywhere in their site a proper threat model, attack simulations or any kind of actual fact that supports the claim of resistance to seizure or censorship. Have you seen those? Also, they clearly forget that most modern CAs actually store SSL certificate details on a blockchain. Its called certificate transparency.