Ah, in that case you should have just said so. We are fundamentally at odds then with irreconcilable differences of opinion on private property. The protection

Ah, in that case you should have just said so. We are fundamentally at odds then with irreconcilable differences of opinion on private property. The protection of private property is a core justification for the State, because as I replied to you elsewhere, private property doesn’t cease without the State but the situation around it becomes more volatile. I do not seek to re-base the State on the socialization of land value and you probably couldn’t with an extreme amount of State violence.