> It's wrong though. Or at least, it doesn't stand up to scrutiny because it isn't falsifiable. If you firmly believe this claim, there's no new information you

> It's wrong though. Or at least, it doesn't stand up to scrutiny because it isn't falsifiable. If you firmly believe this claim, there's no new information you could learn that would cause you to update your belief towards the negative. Point of order, but "There are no use cases for crypto." is absolutely a falsifiable statement, and in fact this article goes on to falsify it. Even "There are no powerful use cases for crypto." is falsifiable along the same lines (it's arguable if the article successfully falsifies this statement, however).