3 ms·
I too snickered at that reply. Then I scrolled, and found his answer adequate. This doesn't mean that exploitation of women as unpaid labor is fake, it's _extr
by LaGrange 4y ago
I too snickered at that reply. Then I scrolled, and found his answer adequate.
This doesn't mean that exploitation of women as unpaid labor is fake, it's _extremely_ rare. But, on the other hand, it's not inconsistent for someone suggesting _relying on your community_ to, you know, _accept help from said community_.
The issue with the unpaid labor of women isn't that we're helping our families, or even that we're not receiving monetary remuneration - it's that it's frequently non-consensual (in the sense that there's no safe possibility to refuse) and without any respect for women's agency.
And, you know - thinking about that this way - it's not like I never proofread a friend's manuscript. It's an interesting, and on many levels enjoyable activity. It's also a quite personal, even intimate, way of helping a friend.
- LaGrange 4y ago> it's _extremely_ rare. ...it's extremely _real_. I wish it was rare.