> Why not let the theories speak for themselves? They did. That's what the "doesn't match the data" part was. It's just that you haven't ever actually studie

> Why not let the theories speak for themselves? They did. That's what the "doesn't match the data" part was. It's just that you haven't ever actually studied this, and are trying to wing your way through fake criticism, the way the kid who never read the book does their book report. Buzzer sound.