3 ms·
You still fail to define what a "class" is simply because you didn't and don't understand it still. https://math.stackexchange.com/a/173002 https://math.stacke
by ethanwillis 4y ago
You still fail to define what a "class" is simply because you didn't and don't understand it still.
https://math.stackexchange.com/a/173002 https://math.stackexchange.com/a/173002 here read up. Also read on Russell's Paradox. I'm not objectively wrong you're just uneducated and your ego is too large. The irony is I was saying the exact same thing you were in my very first comment, except with more precision.
And I still would want you to think about what exactly "output" is.
- svnpenn 4y agoyou seem pretty smart about math, and pretty dumb about regular expressions. Considering that I have a RegEx bronze badge [1], I think I will just trust my own judgment in this matter. 1. https://stackoverflow.com/help/badges/269/regex?userid=1002260 https://stackoverflow.com/help/badges/269/regex?userid=10022...
- sunshinekitty 4y agoeither bad troll or dense