3 ms·
there is no definition that you can attach to "class", that makes it correct for this usage, unless you want to change what the word means. Heres a good quote [
by svnpenn 4y ago
there is no definition that you can attach to "class", that makes it correct for this usage, unless you want to change what the word means. Heres a good quote [1]:
> an expression /re/ can be used to specify a range of lines (matching the pattern), which can be combined with other commands
So the command contains a regex, but its not a regex itself, and its not a class of regex. Sorry, but you don't get to just say "well that's not my definition", and get out of it. Sometimes, you're just objectively wrong. It would be like saying you "donated" something, when you really "pledged" it.
1. https://wikipedia.org/wiki/Regular_expression#Delimiters https://wikipedia.org/wiki/Regular_expression#Delimiters
- ethanwillis 4y agoYou still fail to define what a "class" is simply because you didn't and don't understand it still. https://math.stackexchange.com/a/173002 https://math.stackexchange.com/a/173002 here read up. Also read on Russell's Paradox. I'm not objectively wrong you're just uneducated and your ego is too large. The irony is I was saying the exact same thing you were in my very first comment, except with more precision. And I still would want you to think about what exactly "output" is.
- svnpenn 4y agoyou seem pretty smart about math, and pretty dumb about regular expressions. Considering that I have a RegEx bronze badge [1], I think I will just trust my own judgment in this matter. 1. https://stackoverflow.com/help/badges/269/regex?userid=1002260 https://stackoverflow.com/help/badges/269/regex?userid=10022...
- sunshinekitty 4y agoeither bad troll or dense