4 ms·
they arent really water rights, they are fictitious entitlements to more rainfall than exists. A contract promising something that breaks laws of phisics would
by ClumsyPilot 4y ago
they arent really water rights, they are fictitious entitlements to more rainfall than exists.
A contract promising something that breaks laws of phisics would be considered invalid. These rights should be too.
- oh_sigh 4y agoThat's not really how it works. No one has the right to pull more water from a river than exists in the river. You have a seniority system where the most senior gets to use as much water as they need, and then the second most senior does, and then so on. At a certain point the water runs out no one gets water at that point.