4 ms·
Yeah that's a bit rough. Though I think for most people the cloud solution is the way to go, though - even if it's an evil Saas-recurring-revenue play. I was cl
by vosper 4y ago
Yeah that's a bit rough. Though I think for most people the cloud solution is the way to go, though - even if it's an evil Saas-recurring-revenue play. I was close enough to a previous team that used to admin an on-prem Jira (~7 years ago) to know it wasn't just set-and-forget, and also that almost all the slowness users complained about was due to under-provisioned hardware.
Honestly I reckon half of Jira's reputation for slowness could have come from bad on-prem installs. The cloud version is not slow, and Atlassian does do work on performance
https://community.atlassian.com/t5/Confluence-articles/Confluence-page-tree-quick-search-inline-comments-and-more-now/ba-p/2038903?utm_source=newsletter-email&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=confluence-digest-june_EML-12967&jobid=105614824&subid=1682268016 https://community.atlassian.com/t5/Confluence-articles/Confl...
- capitainenemo 4y agofunny you should say that given a bunch of these rants on the article link sound very much like the cloud version in terms of amount of JS loaded and network requests. Also no shortage of folks elsewhere in this discussion talking about cloud slowness. We've had plenty of irritations with our on-prem, but slowness, not so much. And yeah, for us it's mostly about keeping the data internal.
- cmgbhm 4y agoI’m not convinced the cloud version isn’t terribly slow. There’s a ton more indirection for userids. Screens that used to be part of my standard workflow have Ajax handlers. Even name completion is slow. The #1 question answer on the old ui survey workaround asking why are you using the old ui: slowness. Confluence also got clobbered. I can count page load times.
- denysvitali 4y ago> all the slowness users complained about was due to under-provisioned hardware I think it's more of a software problem tbh.