3 ms·
I don't think this adds any value to the interpretation of the parent's comment and seems overly pedantic. What does your hair-splitting provide when the centra
by vore 4y ago
I don't think this adds any value to the interpretation of the parent's comment and seems overly pedantic. What does your hair-splitting provide when the central thesis of the parent is arguing that land value tax is a tax on productivity when you've even conceded the rebuttal?
- throwaway894345 4y agoLol, the parent was being just as pedantic as I was, and it’s fine. If he’s going to explore abstract technicalities, he invites others to do so as well. I’m sure he’s a grown up and can handle it, and he may even welcome it. If it’s not your cup of tea, downvote and move along. In this case the “added value” is the distinction between “not broadly punishing productivity” and narrowly punishing one kind of unproductivity (as it pertains to land use).