You have to make choices as a social network provider, Either, mostly anything goes, and then you have twitter and facebook. Or you severely restrict nastiness.

You have to make choices as a social network provider, Either, mostly anything goes, and then you have twitter and facebook. Or you severely restrict nastiness. In that option, the collective set of moderators then determine what goes for nastiness, which in all likelihood, will enrage a huge portion of the potential user base, one way or another. It might be a noble quest, but it will fail unless you build, as truth social has done, a network for like minded people. Truth Social will likely fail as well, showing that even within a group, there are major divisions. (It may fail for other reasons as well). The same would be true for a platform that build it's network for liberals only. I suppose you could build a platform for sharing dog and cat photos, and allow saying things like "Who's a good boy", and you might have something sustainable. Although, who knows maybe the cat and dog people will fight over feed space.