3 ms·
I answered a single question, I did not endorse anti-competative practices across the board. In this particular case, they built it therfore they should be able
by CodeSgt 4y ago
I answered a single question, I did not endorse anti-competative practices across the board. In this particular case, they built it therfore they should be able to choose how to distribute it and establish privacy standards as they wish.
- rglullis 4y agoWhat they were trying to do was considered anti-competitive practice, and "They built it therefore they can do whatever they want with it" in isolation makes absolutely no sense.
- CodeSgt 4y ago> answered a single question, I did not endorse anti-competative practices across the board. I also didn't say they could do "whatever they want". Could you please be a good faith conversationalist and reply only to what was actually said, as opposed to your misinterpretation of what was said?
- rglullis 4y agoOk. Let's take what you said, so then maybe you can understand the problem. > they built it therefore they should be able to choose how to distribute it Tied selling is against the law. No matter who makes it, no matter if its free, if you make the acquisition of a product conditional on the acquisition of another one, it is illegal.
- CodeSgt 4y agoOkay? I never said it was legal.