4 ms·

> I think you are underestimating Apple's ability to get around these laws Sure they could try. At which point they would be fined billions of dollars. Just

by stale2002 4y ago

> I think you are underestimating Apple's ability to get around these laws Sure they could try. At which point they would be fined billions of dollars. Just like how they tried to get around the recent app store dating apps law that was in a small country in the EU, and they got lost in court and kept getting fined. Europe isn't really a country that just lets people break their laws. If you break them, you'll be fined. > Apple has effectively collectively bargained What you are describing is called "using significant market power", and is specifically what anti-trust law is designed to prevent. If your argument is that "monopoly power is a good thing, and I want companies to use their significant market power, in a way that anti trust laws are designed to prevent" I guess you could make that argument. But I hope you also are consistent and want to repeal common carrier laws, and any other laws that prevent companies from using their significant market power. Just say it loud and clear, that you think that anti-trust laws are bad, and that using significant market power to anti-competitive control a market is a good thing, if thats what you believe.

ericmay 4y ago
> Europe isn't really a country that just lets people break their laws. If you break them, you'll be fined. Europe isn't really that much better than the US in this regard. See Volkswagen, FIFA, etc. > What you are describing is called "using significant market power", and is specifically what anti-trust law is designed to prevent. Sure if you specifically want to interpret it in the most negative possible light. On the other hand, Apple's position in the market acts as a company who can negotiate on behalf of users (kind of a quasi-union). On our own, no individual can leverage a company like, say, Facebook to have to change how they track users. > Just say it loud and clear, that you think that anti-trust laws are bad, and that using significant market power to anti-competitive control a market is a good thing, if thats what you believe. No, because that's a very naive and unrealistic thing to say or think. Let's actually call this what it is, which is gigantic corporations like Epic and Facebook suing Apple (also a gigantic corporation) because Apple made their predatory business models less profitable. That's all this really is. In every capitalist economy ranging from Norway to Australia to Japan, companies are allowed to create platforms and then engage in business with who they see fit based on rules that they create and enforce on their platform. Facebook and Epic both have rules that they enforce on their platforms. To suggest that the Apple App Store is an anti-competitive marketplace is in the same breath to suggest that Wal-Mart is an anti-competitive marketplace because they won't allow me to sell pornography and Dogecoin. This is made all the more silly when iOS has less market share than Android and you can go and buy an Android phone and install whatever app store you want. If you are actually interested in anti-competitive behavior, take a look at schemes like the MLS (Multiple Listing System) in the US, or various other internet companies.
- deleted 4y ago
  [deleted]
- int_19h 4y ago
  A non-democratic union is not a union.
- ohgodplsno 4y ago
  Saying that Epic has a predatory business while actively praising Apple taking 30% for doing fuck all shows you're truly either in denial or have absolutely no idea what you're talking about.

ericmay 4y ago

> Europe isn't really a country that just lets people break their laws. If you break them, you'll be fined. Europe isn't really that much better than the US in this regard. See Volkswagen, FIFA, etc. > What you are describing is called "using significant market power", and is specifically what anti-trust law is designed to prevent. Sure if you specifically want to interpret it in the most negative possible light. On the other hand, Apple's position in the market acts as a company who can negotiate on behalf of users (kind of a quasi-union). On our own, no individual can leverage a company like, say, Facebook to have to change how they track users. > Just say it loud and clear, that you think that anti-trust laws are bad, and that using significant market power to anti-competitive control a market is a good thing, if thats what you believe. No, because that's a very naive and unrealistic thing to say or think. Let's actually call this what it is, which is gigantic corporations like Epic and Facebook suing Apple (also a gigantic corporation) because Apple made their predatory business models less profitable. That's all this really is. In every capitalist economy ranging from Norway to Australia to Japan, companies are allowed to create platforms and then engage in business with who they see fit based on rules that they create and enforce on their platform. Facebook and Epic both have rules that they enforce on their platforms. To suggest that the Apple App Store is an anti-competitive marketplace is in the same breath to suggest that Wal-Mart is an anti-competitive marketplace because they won't allow me to sell pornography and Dogecoin. This is made all the more silly when iOS has less market share than Android and you can go and buy an Android phone and install whatever app store you want. If you are actually interested in anti-competitive behavior, take a look at schemes like the MLS (Multiple Listing System) in the US, or various other internet companies.

deleted 4y ago
[deleted]
int_19h 4y ago
A non-democratic union is not a union.
ohgodplsno 4y ago
Saying that Epic has a predatory business while actively praising Apple taking 30% for doing fuck all shows you're truly either in denial or have absolutely no idea what you're talking about.