I think this entire post may be an experiment in misinformation? Nothing in here really adds up. For one, Google didn't own YouTube in the 90s. In fact, YouT

I think this entire post may be an experiment in misinformation? Nothing in here really adds up. For one, Google didn't own YouTube in the 90s. In fact, YouTube didn't exist. So that reference to a "Google rep in the 90s" is clearly wrong. But let's assume they meant "the 2010s", which would be the most reasonable time for such an interaction. Beyond that there doesn't seem to be much evidence that the Cornell account was de-platformed, or if it was, it was not for very long and clearly a quickly rectified error. The author has some legitimate complaints, but they seem to be surrounded by exaggerations or just lies.