3 ms·
Censorship resistance? It's the exact opposite despite the efforts. When you include CA based TLS in the protocol and there's no option for clear text, combine
by superkuh 4y ago
Censorship resistance? It's the exact opposite despite the efforts.
When you include CA based TLS in the protocol and there's no option for clear text, combined with no human person in existence running a recognized CA, what you get is complete non-human control of the entire web. It becomes no longer possible to host a visitable website without getting (temporary) approval from some CA. And guess what? If that CA isn't already a government entity, it sure can be influenced by them and other outside forces. Protocol baked in CA TLS is very dangerous for human persons despite how great it is for corporate persons.
- jhugo 4y agoCA based TLS isn't included in the protocol. The UA is free to decide how to trust certificates. If you can come up with a better model than the CA model, QUIC supports your model without changes.
- hulitu 4y agoIt is for your own good. Think about the children. You are empowered. Safe, private and secure. We value your privacy. /s