3 ms·
No, you would look at the version of the language, realize it's 0.2 and not production ready yet.
by amedvednikov 4y ago
No, you would look at the version of the language, realize it's 0.2 and not production ready yet.
- tene 4y agoNo, I really wouldn't, and don't. This is the kind of thing that reads to me as honest for a new in-development language: https://github.com/cruxlang/crux#status https://github.com/cruxlang/crux#status Features are explicitly listed as working, partially done, and not yet implemented. You're really truly allowed to say "This doesn't work yet, but we're working on...", and it is legitimate to criticize people for choosing to lie instead.
- amedvednikov 4y agoWell that's what it literally says on the website: > V avoids doing unnecessary allocations in the first place by using value types, string buffers, promoting a simple abstraction-free code style. > Right now allocations are handled by a minimal and well performing GC until V's autofree engine is production ready.