3 ms·
Wouldn't IBM be the title holders there?
by Jedd 4y ago
Wouldn't IBM be the title holders there?
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]
- capableweb 4y ago"open-source company" is kind of an subjective term at this point I guess, so hard to say. But what can be said, is that even though IBM contributes a lot to open source, not many would claim IBM is a "open-source company" I think, at least when compared to Red Hat.
- Jedd 4y agoYeah, I get that distinction, and the vagueness of the phrase 'open source' doesn't help with this kind of definition. If IBM put US$1B into 'Linux' 22 years ago - but this was a small part of their operating budget at the time - do we look at absolute or comparative value? If IBM buys, three years ago, RedHat for US$34B, does that mean IBM is now the biggest 'open source' company? (If so, the next question is obvious.)