> If you have water, you can produce plants. Simply untrue: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antarctica https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antarctica > What land spe

> If you have water, you can produce plants. Simply untrue: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antarctica https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antarctica > What land specifically is useful for animals, but not capturing carbon or growing plants? Please give a specific example. Careful moving those goal posts, you'll hurt your back. Not a goal anybody set. But here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rangeland https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rangeland Animal farming improved human use of land, and indeed crop farming depends a lot on animal byproducts. Or do you prefer unsustainable mineral fertilizers?