3 ms·
In most countries, they simply conscripted them. There was no "convincing". Australia is one of the exceptions, although certainly not because the government di
by jlangenauer 4y ago
In most countries, they simply conscripted them. There was no "convincing". Australia is one of the exceptions, although certainly not because the government didn't want conscription.
- derevaunseraun 4y ago> In most countries, they simply conscripted them. There was no "convincing" But who conscripted them and dragged them off to war? Was it the politicians who decided to go to war? The "convincing" isn't necessary once it's reached critical mass
- rswail 4y agoWe didn't have conscription in WW1, but we did in WW2 and then "National Service" in the 50s. In the 60s there was a draft that had a "ball draw" every month with the date (a ball numbered from 1-28/30/31) and if you turned 18 on that date of the month, you were drafted. There were exemptions but it still seems a cruel form of gambling in a way.
- opo 4y ago>We didn't have conscription in WW1, ... There was a military draft in WW I: >...By the end of World War I, some two million men volunteered for various branches of the armed services, and some 2.8 million had been drafted. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Selective_Service_Act_of_1917 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Selective_Service_Act_of_1917