3 ms·

Local branch names for short-lived branches are a crutch, there's nothing they convey that commit messages don't express better. What happens if you amend a co

• kjeetgill 4y ago
  > Local branch names for short-lived branches are a crutch Hm. We must use git completely differently then. I can't really imagine what what I'd do without them. > there's nothing they convey that commit messages don't express better. Presumably you'd still want to maintain a list of HEADs, so you just want to alway refer to them by hash instead of a branch name? That's fine I guess -- not sure what it buys you. > What happens if you amend a commit after checking it out? Then it becomes a new commit? Not sure what you're getting at.