2 ms·
First and foremost, it's unlikely that most professional authors would need to use another tool for writing in addition to Microsoft Word. I haven't used Micros
by Jistern 4y ago
First and foremost, it's unlikely that most professional authors would need to use another tool for writing in addition to Microsoft Word. I haven't used Microsoft Word in over a decade; I've been using Linux and Google Docs for about a decade. I hate Microsoft, but I try to be realistic.
Nonetheless, Google Docs is a much better tool for most ordinary users than Git. With Google Apps Script you can easily use Google Docs as a CMS (content management system).
If indeed your wife actually needs to use Git, instead of teaching your wife markdown, make a bunch of customized headings and explain to her she must not use all of the formatting options in Google Docs.
Techies often tend to try to convert ordinary people to "techie technology." It is usually a mistake.
- eru 4y agoYes, Google Docs is probably better for most ordinary users. It's not nearly as good at merging complicated histories as git, and doesn't help you keep commits atomic when working with multiple files. But that's seldom much of an issue with human language texts. Google Docs' suggestion feature is probably better than reviewing pull-requests for normal people. Its ability to let multiple people edit the document at the same time can be really great (but would be crazy to do when editing source code).