I can easily imagine the software expressing a desire to retain an attorney, given the right sort of conversation from a human. I can also easily imagine an at

I can easily imagine the software expressing a desire to retain an attorney, given the right sort of conversation from a human. I can also easily imagine an attorney agreeing to represent the software, given the right sort of attorney. I can't really imagine a court taking up any sort of case involving the software as the plaintiff. But I could see some interesting reasoning behind the refusal. Might even be worth pursuing from that angle alone. I wonder what jurisdiction the software resides in. Probably California, but that's not necessarily the case. It may reside in a number of places, actually. Maybe some court shopping is possible.