I understand how it works. I simply don't "agree" with it. But then I wouldn't, being the innocent party at the sharp end of arbitrary "punishment". One could

I understand how it works. I simply don't "agree" with it. But then I wouldn't, being the innocent party at the sharp end of arbitrary "punishment". One could be weak natured and claim to be a "victim of discrimination" (but then ironically the problem is indiscrimination), or entitled and say Cloudflare and site owners should do a better job. Both seem indignant and unhelpful. The problem is obviously complex. Optimistically, better education of small site operators might help them understand that when they employ a service like this they are excluding significant numbers of the kind of people they might want visiting. I think they should know that, and so supporters of Cloudflare ought not try to muddy the waters or blame those who want a better experience on the web. On the other hand, some sites really don't want visitors who value privacy, and that's fair enough too. Cloudflare etc provide a very effective service for excluding us.