2 ms·
Adding a mention that V is still far from 1.0 in the title or at the beginning would have been honest.
by hunam 4y ago
Adding a mention that V is still far from 1.0 in the title or at the beginning would have been honest.
- somethingor 4y agoV’s Github description from October 2019 would have disagreed https://web.archive.org/web/20191020121218/https://github.com/vlang/v https://web.archive.org/web/20191020121218/https://github.co...
- Tozen 4y agoHopefully what is not being suggested is that creators of open-source programming languages are not allowed to revise their release schedules, underestimate, or change the number of features it will have. Languages such as Nim have took 11 years before reaching 1.0, so V is still doing comparatively well. V's pace of development has been quite fast and substantial. More comparable languages such as Zig and Odin have yet to hit 1.0 as well, and are many years older. Yes, the pace of development is getting faster and user patience less, but V should still be afforded some leeway in this regard.