Odd that no one mentioned SEO? Linking to anything in your article is bad, if people click on it they are not clicking on advertisements. If its a page not of

Odd that no one mentioned SEO? Linking to anything in your article is bad, if people click on it they are not clicking on advertisements. If its a page not often linked to by high profile websites you are endorsing it. The target page (journal publication) might not be available to the crawler. It could be poorly formatted from a search engines perspective. But if it isn't paywalled the article about the publication is pretty much a less specific duplicate of the page you've linked to. Which one to rank higher? The duplicate or the original? Extra points if you copy the illustrations too. Ah, you've been using the big words now have you? These big unusual words must be important to the context of the article. The average casual reader most likely prefers English. You put a date at the top of your article? That means it is important today but less important on every day that follows. I'm sure I'm missing 20 other relevant "optimizations". edit: Try imagine what happens with the news website if it is dropped from the index because it doesn't follow the SEO guidelines. Is there any hope?