There is huge potential if you abstract a little, like in the transmitter - receiver model. In short: AI has no ego and does not care about self-expression and

There is huge potential if you abstract a little, like in the transmitter - receiver model. In short: AI has no ego and does not care about self-expression and telling "my story". It gives people, what people want. Put another way: AI's style his highly flexible, while human authors struggle even with slightest of critic. I can relate. ;) Also consider the average human being not having an IQ of 130+ (even though 80% thinks otherwise ;)). We all live in a bubble and at least AI does not care, if you use highly academic phrasing ("Because I studied hard, I use these words!" or not. If you consider A/B testing and real-time feedback, you can image some sort of translator with sliders for "Which audience do you want to address?" Every note then becomes designed. This has some potential. We all love R. Feynman for his metaphors, that explain complicated topics. This might work also in the other direction, accessibility: Insert Thomas Mann's Doctor Faustus - and voila, even a 15 year old finally can understand the book.