Sure, you could put it that way. There are always two sides to this: one side says onus is on the individual to regulate what they do/consume, other side blames

Sure, you could put it that way. There are always two sides to this: one side says onus is on the individual to regulate what they do/consume, other side blames the addictive properties of the substance. The internet is no way comparable to a physical addiction like tobacco, in fact I'm not sure if it could even be called an addiction. I'd put it this way: our way of life today has been altered because of the internet. By default, you have a lot of exposure to media today which means our baseline tolerance for media is very high. Toning this down is very achievable but is not trivial and requires some effort and habit-forming.