3 ms·
The microfilm recipe book made me think this -- the recipes were organized and ad-free, unlike most online recipes today.
by deckeraa 4y ago
The microfilm recipe book made me think this -- the recipes were organized and ad-free, unlike most online recipes today.
- lowwave 4y agoOnline ads really ruined many things for people. No body likes online ads, yet for some reason it is just keep on going.
- kalleboo 4y agoThe only thing people like less than online ads is actually paying money for things.
- pintxo 4y agoLargely triggered by the fact that you can only judge the value of information after the consumption. And consumption of information is a one time event. So the only really established payment is subscriptions which people seem to be reluctant to engage with for certain types of information.
- janci 4y agoOn the other hand, people do not mind giving things for free. Those recipes are not published by some chef that gets paid for creating them. It's the community that created them. If people could easily self-host ad-free catalog of their recipes with a global catalog for a cost of internet service they already have, they probably would. But the emphasis is on ease of use and discoverability.
- kalleboo 4y agoYeah for recipes in particular I guess it's odd there's no kind of recipe equivalent of Wikipedia
- MichaelZuo 4y agoVery few residential customers have static IPs which is a prerequisite to hosting anything. And to be fair to ISPs a static IP does cost money to provide.
- janci 4y agoThat is what I meant - if only self hosting would be easy a d required no additional services. Unfortunately it isn't.
- endgame 4y agoTrouble is, you pay money _and_ you get the ads! So why pay for things?