4 ms·
Docker Hub is all-you-can-eat with regard to image storage; GitHub's container registry is metered based on storage, and last time I tried it (over a year ago)
by jordemort 4y ago
Docker Hub is all-you-can-eat with regard to image storage; GitHub's container registry is metered based on storage, and last time I tried it (over a year ago) it was also really hard to clean up old images.
- xyzzy123 4y agoThat does seem like one of those "too good to be true" arrangements that can fall victim to pricing updates down the track. That said, not unreasonable to take advantage of it while it lasts.
- yjftsjthsd-h 4y agoYeah, my immediate reaction was "and that's why Docker Hub will either start charging more or go out of business, both of which will be rather disruptive to your business".
- OJFord 4y agoDoes it not have paid tiers too though? Like Actions (which you suggested as free) also increases as you need more minutes. (On the other side, Docker Hub is I think a lot more if not completely free if the underlying repo is public? I know I have a few low use ones and don't pay a penny, anyway.) I suppose my point really is just why suggest paying for image storage intially/before CI, they can both be free.
- molszanski 4y agoWe did hit some magical limit on storage and transfer. And we where a paying customer. $250 or something. No warning, no emails, they turned off our our accounts. Hence no deployments. Support was silent. Now we use quay.io and a self hosted harbor docker registry.