3 ms·
Yeah, a common mode when I'm making changes is "add a field to the type, run the type-checker, fix all the failures." In a sense "type coverage" is analogous t
by repsilat 4y ago
Yeah, a common mode when I'm making changes is "add a field to the type, run the type-checker, fix all the failures."
In a sense "type coverage" is analogous to test coverage.
- klysm 4y agoI use this workflow so frequently - writing it the first time is harder but, changing it is so much easier that it’s absolutely worth it to me.