4 ms·

Honestly I’d take CVS over subversion. Merging was just bad on subversion and I found the IDE integrations to be confusing, obtuse and buggy. Sure, CVS was l

by mnd999 4y ago

Honestly I’d take CVS over subversion. Merging was just bad on subversion and I found the IDE integrations to be confusing, obtuse and buggy. Sure, CVS was limited but it was reliable and straightforward.

DonHopkins 4y ago
...And better than SCCS! ;)
johannes1234321 4y ago
> Sure, CVS was limited but it was reliable and straightforward. It was so reliable that people complained about SVN using a DB (Berkeley DB) as backend, as manual fixing of CVS files was a "normal" part of operation and people didn't believe that might not be needed ...