From the pre-print paper[1]: > ... we believe the next generation of language models must be designed not to undermine human intuition Right, but isn't a majo

From the pre-print paper[1]: > ... we believe the next generation of language models must be designed not to undermine human intuition Right, but isn't a major reason why we build these huge language models to replace actual humans in e.g. Level 1 support with chatbots? Almost all chatbots I used in the past (and most were not even ML based, someone programmed this in) were weirdly personal and tried to be non-robotic, with jokes and human-like reactions to inputs like "Thanks!". Taking a look at some projects that used GPT-3[2], many try to imitate humans. For some, like Replika.ai, the whole "being human" thing is their entire schtick. There is obviously a market for text completion AIs that imitate humans, so it's doubtful that we'll get this toothpaste back into the tube, IMO. [1] https://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/2206/2206.07271.pdf https://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/2206/2206.07271.pdf [2] https://medium.com/letavc/apps-and-startups-powered-by-gpt-3-976c55dbc737 https://medium.com/letavc/apps-and-startups-powered-by-gpt-3... (caution, 2020)