3 ms·
> Some of the people could be considered type B or less productive, Type B? Is that an established concept?
by rightbyte 4y ago
> Some of the people could be considered type B or less productive,
Type B? Is that an established concept?
- mirntyfirty 4y agoNot an expert on these types of things but I think that there’s this notion of a type A personality that gets overly glorified in the self-help and corporate productivity realms...at least from what I’ve noticed. I’ve found it to be silly though because I’ve also noticed top workers that are perfectly calm, easy to talk to, and not competitive in the slightest. And yes, these types of subjective things can be argued eternally but these have been my observations and experience.
- 0x20cowboy 4y ago> not competitive in the slightest. I prefer collaborating and building a team. I find people who “like to complete” to be short sighted, and often produce bad work over the long run - they already think they are “the best” and often don’t improve in a broader picture. The cup is already full so to speak. Almost all paths are for “type A”s in the tech world. Seems people didn’t learn anything from MoneyBall.
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]
- raverbashing 4y agoFor real, splitting personalities in 2 types is such a reductionist approach that the only ones who take it seriously are the self-help coaches MBTI is debatable, but it tries to be a better measure than just A/B
- 121789 4y agotype A/B is an unscientific concept that is mainly used by a subset of people to justify their neurotic behavior
- nowherebeen 4y agoSo basically people with a superiority complex
- absolutelymild 4y agoI don’t know where these terms come from, but I’ve heard it as Type A is organized, disciplined, uptight and Type B is disorganized, undisciplined, laid back